[ Begin ] [ Overview ] [ Scenario Descriptions ] [ End Of Scenario Comparison ]
[ Metrics Charts ] [ Parks and State Trust Lands ] [ Publications/References ]
[ Scenario 1: Managed Growth ] [ Scenario 2: Status Quo ] [ Scenario 3: Ultra-Managed Growth ]

PHX-UGM Additional References

Berling-Wolff, S. and J. Wu. 2004. Urban growth models: A historical review. Ecological Research 19:119-129. [PDF]

Berling-Wolff, S. and J. Wu. 2004. Modeling urban landscape dynamics: A case study in Phoenix, USA. Urban Ecosystems (in press).

Clarke, K.C., S. Hoppen and L. Gaydos. 1997. A Self-Modifying Cellular Automaton Model of Historical Urbanization in the San Francisco Bay Area. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 24:247-261.

Couclelis, H. 1985. Cellular Worlds: a Framework for Modeling Micro-Macro Dynamics. Environment and Planning A 17:585-596.

Ellman, T. 1997. Infill: The Cure for Sprawl? Accessed 8 November 2002, www.urbanfutures.org/abstract.cfm?id=28

Gammage, G. Jr. 1999. Phoenix in Perspective: Reflection on Developing the Desert. Herberger Center for Design Excellence, Arizona State University: Tempe AZ.

Gordon, P., H. Richardson, A. Donghwan and T. O’Brien. 2000. The Economic Effects of Arizona’s Proposed Citizen’s Growth Management Initiative. Accessed 20 September 2002, www.azchamber.com/commerce/Gordon.pdf

Jelinski, D.E. and J.Wu. 1996. The Modifiable Areal Unit Problem and Implications for Landscape Ecology. Landscape Ecology 11(3):129-140.

Jenerette, D.G. and J. Wu. 2001. Analysis and Simulation of Land-Use Change in the Central Arizona–Phoenix Region. Landscape Ecology 16: 611-626.

Kirtland, D., L. Gaydos, K. Clarke, L. DeCola, W. Acevedo, and C. Bell. 1994. An Analysis of Human-Induced Land Transformations in the San Francisco Bay/Sacramento Area. World Resources Review 6(2):206-217.

Knowles-Yanez, K., C. Morizt, J. Fry, M. Bucchin, C.L. Redman and P. McCartney. 1999. Historic land use team: Phase I report on generalized landuse. Central Arizona Phoenix LTER: Phoenix, Arizona, USA.

Luck, M. and J. Wu. 2002. A gradient analysis of the landscape pattern of urbanization in the Phoenix metropolitan area of USA. Landscape Ecology 17:327-339. [PDF]

Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan.1997. Accessed 8 November 2002, www.maricopa.gov/planning/compln/COMPLAN.asp.htm

McGarigal, K. and B.J. Marks. 1995. FRAGSTATS: Spatial Pattern Analysis Program for Quantifying Landscape Structure. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-351. Pacific Northwest Research Station, USDA-Forest Service, Portland.

Morrison Institute For Public Policy. 2000. Hits and Misses: Fast Growth in Metropolitan Phoenix. School of Public Affairs, Arizona State University. Accessed 8 November 2002, www.asu.edu/copp/morrison.

Peoria, Arizona Website. 2002. www.peoriaaz.com/index1.htm.

Turner, M.G., R. Costanza and F. Sklar. 1989. Methods to Evaluate the Performance of Spatial Simulation Models. Ecological Modelling 48:1-18.

White, R. and G. Engelen. 1993. Cellular Automata and Fractal Urban Form: a Cellular Modelling Approach to the Evolution of Urban Land-Use Patterns. Environment and Planning A 25:1175-1199.

Wu, J., D. E. Jelinski, M. Luck and P. Tueller. 2000. Multiscale Analysis of Landscape Heterogeneity: Scale Variance and Pattern Metrics. Geographic Information Sciences 6(1):6-19.

Wu, J., W. Shen, W. Sun and P. T. Tueller. 2002. Empirical patterns of the effects of changing scale on landscape metrics. Landscape Ecology 17:761-782.

Wu, J. and J. L. David. 2002. A spatially explicit hierarchical approach to modeling complex ecological systems: Theory and applications. Ecological Modelling 153:7-26. [PDF]

Wu, J., J. L. David, and G. D. Jenerette. 2003. Linking land use change with ecosystem processes: A hierarchical patch dynamics model. In Subhro Guhathakurta (ed.), Integrated Land Use and Environmental Models. Springer, New York, pp.99-119.

Wu, J. 2004. Effects of changing scale on landscape pattern analysis: Scaling relations. Landscape Ecology 19:125-138. [PDF]

For more references, visit http://LEML.asu.edu